Medicare Not Limited to the Portion of a Settlement Designated for Medical Losses when Seeking Reimbursement under MSP
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has ruled that Medicare is not limited to the portion of a settlement or verdict designated for medical losses when seeking reimbursement under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act, 42 USC § 1395(b)(2) ("MSP"). Hadden v United States (Lawyers Weekly No. 01-76843). This ultimately could lead to a chilling effect on settlements.
In Hadden, Mr. Hadden was injured in Kentucky in 2004 when a vehicle owned by Pennyrile Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation struck him. Medicare paid $82,036.17 for his medical expenses. Hadden sued Pennyrile and settled the suit for $125,000. After deducting Hadden's attorney fees, Medicare demanded the remaining $62,338.07. Hadden paid under protest, arguing that the unidentified vehicle that caused the Pennyrile truck to swerve into him was 90% at fault, Pennyrile was only 10% at fault, and thus the settlement with Pennyrile should entitle Medicare to reimbursement of only 10% of its lien, or about $8,000.
The Sixth Circuit disagreed and affirmed an administrative law judge's decision that held that a 2003 amendment to § 1395y(b)(2)(B)(ii) did not leave room for Hadden's argument.
However, this opinion was not unanimous with Judge Helene White dissenting on the ground that the majority's interpretation was, among other things, inconsistent with the reasoning in the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in Arkansas Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v Ahlborn, 547 U.S. 282 (2006). She also noted that the majority's decision "discourages settlements and may ultimately hinder CMS's efforts to recover conditional Medicare payments." In essence if Medicare gets the entire settlement amount without regard to fault, individuals will likely be less apt to settle (as they have nothing to personally gain).
Given the potential hindrance to settlement, it is unlikely to be the final word. For now, however, it is the law in Michigan.
Categories: Medicare/Medicaid
Categories
- HIPAA
- Digital Assets
- Long-Term Care
- Medicare/Medicaid
- Technology
- Licensing
- Patents
- Providers
- News & Events
- Fraud & Abuse
- Lawsuit
- News
- Affordable Care Act
- Medicare
- Employee Benefits
- Employment
- Hospice
- Audits
- Retirement
- Health Care Reform
- Hospitals
- Insurance
- Department of Labor
- Billing/Payment
- Criminal
- Alerts and Updates
- HITECH Act
- Workers' Compensation
- Electronic Health Records
- 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
- Physicians
- Pharmacy
- Regulatory
- Labor Relations
- Privacy
- Did you Know?
- Tax
- Accountable Care Organizations
- Legislative Updates
- Regulations
- Compliance
- Medicaid Planning
- COVID-19 and Workers' Compensation
- Cybersecurity
- Contracts
- Health Insurance Exchange
Best Lawyers® 2021
Congratulations to the attorneys of the Health Care practice group at Foster Swift Collins & Smith, PC for their inclusion in the Best Lawyers in America 2021 edition. Firm-wide, 44 lawyers were listed. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on an exhaustive peer-review evaluation and as lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be listed; inclusion in Best Lawyers is considered a singular honor. Health Care practice group members listed in Best Lawyers are as follows:
- Jennifer B. Van Regenmorter, Holland
To see the full list of Foster Swift attorneys listed in Best Lawyers 2021, click here.